What has happened to Free Speech? This is America right?

OUTRAGEOUS! What has happened in America?

What has happened when you can no longer practice free speech nor have a guest on blog talk radio that wants the great one to produce his birth certificate? Phillip Berg was to be the guest on blog talk radio with No Compromise and they cancelled not only the show but shut it down. Berg has filed a law suit for Obama to produce his Birth Certificate. You can see the background on this from my former post:Is Obama a Citizen? Plus Caught on Tape Saying Acorn & Friends will shape his Presidential agenda

We cannot allow these kinds of things to happen here. This is still America. If we do not stand up now..who will stand up for you later? The double standards that are taking place in this country right now are appalling! We need to stop this now and we need to stop it fast.

See the link below with the blog information.

Phil Berg is my guest today on No Compromise Radio,

Call the blog radio and tell them you want freedom to reign again. We are losing our liberties folks..EMAIL IT TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.


UPDATE: I scheduled a show with Attorney Phil Berg who has filed a lawsuit against Barack Obama for not being a US Citizen therefore he is an illegal alien.

My show was terminated at the beginning of the show. Why? The BTR assistant Director of Customer Relations, Shannon Dingee-Kramer stated that my show was, “racially or ethnically offensive, defamatory, unreasonably violent, threatening, intimidating or harassing; 2. contains falsehoods or misrepresentations that could damage BlogTalkRadio or any other person; (BTR red emphasis–not mine!)

In other words, those who claim to be for free speech are afraid of it when they see it, or hear it in this case! It might offend someone and that’s far more important to protect than the American Principle of exercising the flow of speech in the arena of public ideas.

So I am officially off the air until further notice thanks to the Obamunists and Islamists who support him!

Advertisements

Obama Plays GANGLAND STYLE with FREE SPEECH!

OBAMA CHICAGO DIRTY Gangland Style & Dirty TRICKS IS AT IT AGAIN!

How much do we have to know about this narcissistic con artist to realize he is going to bring change all right. CHANGE OF REGRET! REGRET THAT WE EVER HEARD HIS NAME!

So this is on false criticisms…to H*ll with free speech! How long before If the creep is elected, we will all be arrested for daring to say anything negative about him and his tactics. He is opening the door to threaten another time honored liberty that we hold dear.

SEE NO EVIL- HEAR NO EVIL -SPEAK NO EVIL…Well just arrest me! I am shouting it from the rooftop as long as I can.

Michelle Malkin says it is just the latest example of his (click this: bare-knuckle, speech-chilling bully tactics. Be sure you check that link out.. whose efforts to fight the Obama Goon Squad Michelle has covered extensively,

Missouri-based Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit has an overview of how “St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch and St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, both Obama supporters, are threatening to bring criminal libel charges against anyone who levels what turns out to be false criticisms of their chosen candidate for President.”

Glenn Reynolds has a thorough round-up. Be sure to check out Glenn’s post.

Continue reading

GOOGLE SHUTS DOWN ANTI-OBAMA SITES

Hattip to Atlas Shrugs,

You will want to check this out..Pam of Atlas believes google is a dangerous company..dangerous for gmail etc:

Excerpts below:

Go here and scroll. This is protot-ypical of the left. They cannot compete – they cannot debate.What is this but a club to the tenets of free speech? What is the fairness doctrine but a club to the free market of ideas?

The following is an update on this post: OBAMA: TERROR BLOGS CHECK! COUNTER JIHAD BLOGS DELETE! ANTI-OBAMA SITES BLOCKED!

Google Shuts Down Anti-Obama Sites on its Blogger Platform hat tip JJ

-By Warner Todd Huston, Town Hall

It looks like Google has officially joined the Barack Obama campaign and decided that its contribution would be to shut down any blog on the Google owned Blogspot.com blogging system that has an anti-Obama message. Yes, it sure seems that Google has begun to go through its many thousands of blogs to lock out the owners of anti-Obama blogs so that the noObama message is effectively squelched. Thus far, Google has terminated the access by blog owners to 7 such sites and the list may be growing. Boy, it must be nice for Barack Obama to have an ally powerful enough to silence his opponents like that!

It isn’t just conservative sites that Google’s Blogger platform is eliminating. For instance, www.comealongway.blogspot.com has been frozen and this one is a Hillary supporting site. The operator of Come a Long Way has a mirror site off the Blogspot platform and has today posted this notice:

I used to have a happy internet home on Blogger: http://www.comealongway.blogspot.com. Then on Wednesday night, June 25, I received the following e-mail:

Dear Blogger user,

This is a message from the Blogger team.

Your blog, at http://comealongway.blogspot.com/, has been identified as a potential spam blog. You will not be able to publish posts to your blog until we review your site and confirm that it is not a spam blog.

Sincerely,

The Blogger Team

It turns out that there is an interesting pattern where it concerns the blogs that Google’s Blogspot team have summarily locked down on their service. They all belong to the Just Say No Deal coalition, a group of blogs that are standing against the Obama campaign. It seems the largest portion of these blogs are Hillary supporting blogs, too.

All I can say is, WOW! If Google is willing to abuse its power like this even against fellow leftists, what does it plan against conservatives, the folks Google hates even more!?

Here is a list of the Blogspot blogs that have been frozen by Google thus far: The blogs are there, just frozen to the blogger, they cannot post..suppose they think visitors will just stop coming over and it will die down..don’t think they know how bloggers will help other bloggers..no matter your politics..right is right and wrong is wrong! When they don’t like something on this blog…how long will it be before you support something they don’t like? So get up in arms people!

Update: some of the bloggers have been reinstated so to speak, many have moved their sites to wordpress. It would seem from what I can tell, that some savvy bloggers marked the blogs as spam..Google’s policies should be (from where I sit) to investigate before freezing a blog..investigate if it is truly spam or unethical people causing this..as it seems that is what happened at the present time.

· Blue Lyon @ http://bluelyon.blogspot.com

Come A Long Way @ http://comealongway.blogspot.com

Hillary or Bust @ http://hillaryorbust.blogspot.com

· McCain Democrats @ http://mccaindemocrats.blogspot.com

· NObama Blog @ http://nobamablog.blogspot.com

· politicallizard.blogspot.com @ http://thelizardannex.blogspot.com

· Reflections in Tyme @ http://reflections-in-tyme.blogspot.com

On another topic:

Wow, talk about dirty politics…any reader on this blog knows I am no Obama lover and consider him to be dangerous to our country…You also know I have felt the Media has given him a free pass..I have also stated that there was no loyalty to Hillary Clinton from the Democratic party..not to mention some of those close to her campaign..Bill Mitchell..others and certainly no condemnation from Boxer, Pelosi, Feinstein and others on the behavior of his campaign and supporters..but this is certainly an interesting blog spot for you to visit..could someone have stuck a knife in Hillary’s campaign from within the campaign? Read this and check out the video and see what you think..

You’ve got to see this fascinating analysis by Karen Hill exposing someone within the Clinton campaign (or the advertising firm) trying to sabotage Hillary Clinton through messages planted in her advertisements. Go read Karen Hill’s analysis, Is this Obama-style politics? We know how he played dirty politics with Alice Palmer, had her eliminated after all, he did not want to run against a viable incumbent. Much easier to get elected when there is no one to oppose you. Heck, we all know the change Obamamaniacs want to bring to America..If Karen Hill’s analysis is correct..there is a new low in politics..Obama’s supporters that reduce themselves to getting blogs blocked says a lot about the caliber of his supporters but for someone on the inside to sabotage? Well, say it ain’t so.

Fitna, stand for free speech

 Christians must pay

I join my friend NC asking all bloggers who are pro-Free Speech and refuse to be intimidated by Islamists to visit the site below and if you can upload the video please do so, I cannot get the video’s to upload for some reason.

Please sign the petitions below ..thanks!

Sign the Declaration Against Genocide here
Ban the Koran as Hate Speech! Sign Petition here!

Defense of Geert Wilders,

 http://www.petitiononline.com/wilders/petition.html .

The Video link and post below is by and from

 No Compromise When it Comes to Being Right!

the link below for the video’s.

FITNA–Stand for FREE SPEECH!

NC Asks: If Islam is such a great world religion then why do it’s followers insist on suing those who vehemently speak out against it? If Islam is such a great world religion then why not allow the light of criticism to shine upon it without threatening to kill the questioner? If Islam is such a great world religion then why is Ayann Hirsi Ali, Craig Winn, Geert Wilders, and many others marked for deathfor speaking out against it? Why was Theo von Gogh murdered for questioning Islam’s treatment of women? What do the leaders of Islam have to hide? Why is killing Jews and Christians the only guaranteed path to Heaven under Islamic doctrine?
Islam and Free Speech
by Peter Hoekstra

ed-ah274_hoekst_20080325181436.jpg

Marked for death: Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

The Netherlands is bracing for a new round of violence at home and against its embassies in the Middle East. The storm would be caused by “Fitna,”a short film that is scheduled to be released this week. The film, which reportedly includes images of a Quran being burned, was produced by Geert Wilders, a member of the Dutch parliament and leader of the Freedom Party. Mr. Wilders has called for banning the Quran — which he has compared to Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” — from the Netherlands.

After concern about the film led Mr. Wilders’s Internet service provider to take down his Web site, Mr. Wilders issued a statement this week that he will personally distribute DVDs “On the Dam” if he has to. That may not be necessary, as the Czech National Party has reportedly agreed to host the video on its Web site.

Reasonable men in free societies regard Geert Wilders’s anti-Muslim rhetoric, and films like “Fitna,” as disrespectful of the religious sensitivities of members of the Islamic faith. But free societies also hold freedom of speech to be a fundamental human right. We don’t silence, jail or kill people with whom we disagree just because their ideas are offensive or disturbing. We believe that when such ideas are openly debated, they sink of their own weight and attract few followers.

Continue reading

Free Speech threatened by CAIR

  

             Savage shows how.  Stand up, Fight back

 

Mike Savage and his radio talk show have come under attack by the terrorist worshipping CAIR organization.

  This is not the first time CAIR has attempted violating the first amendment rights of those who disagree with radical Islam.  The CAIR organization also tried silencing author Robert Spencer when Spencer was scheduled to speak to the Young America’s Foundation (YAF) last summer.  CAIR had threatened legal action against the YAF if Spencer spoke. 

Continue reading

The Race for the American Mind

source: Selwyn Duke

Last year’s scamnesty bill had widespread support among the powers-that-be, with the president, the Democrat majority and mainstream media all singing its praises.  Yet it went down to defeat, slain by a new-media coalition of talk radio and blogosphere warriors.  Working tirelessly to expose the truth and rally the grassroots, they became a David who slew a Goliath. 

Forty-three years ago it was a different world.  Ted Kennedy had co-authored the “Immigration Reform Act of 1965,” which created a situation wherein 85 percent of our immigrants hail from the Third World and Asia.  He took to the Senate floor, claimed his brainchild wouldn’t change the demographic composition of the nation and passed the culture-rending bill under the cover of darkness.
This darkness was not absence of light but that of truth; it was a media blackout.  With no Internet and little talk radio, mainstream journalists had a monopoly over the hearts and minds of America.  And they knew best.  The little people didn’t have to worry their pretty little heads about actions that would forever alter the face of the nation.
This is why the old media fears the new one.  The latter watches the watchers, polices the police.  It has cut into the Rathersphere’s market, causing a diminution of circulation, viewership and – this is what really gets their collars up — power.  They can no longer propagandize with Tass-like impunity, for the e-hills have eyes. 
Yet this is no time for a victory dance.  The new media is under attack, as the left aims to silence dissent before it grows strong enough to block the thought police’s coup de grace.  This is the race for the American mind. 
And we are losing
The attack upon free expression is more varied than one may think, but I’ll start with the obvious.  Most have heard of the euphemistically-named “Fairness Doctrine,” which would essentially eliminate traditionalist talk radio.  People such as Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage may then be relegated to satellite – assuming they’re willing to leap into the ether – and its far smaller audience. 
Then we have hate speech laws, which empower governments to punish people of politically incorrect passions.  In Europe, Canada and elsewhere, average citizens have suffered persecution for criticizing homosexuality and Islam and voicing other unfashionable truths.  And as hate speech laws become more entrenched and accepted, the list of taboos of the tongue grows longer – and more widespread.  They’re coming soon to a theater of social operations near you.
And these laws are netting the famous as well as the anonymous.  Two Canadian “Human Rights Commissions” are investigating columnist Mark Steyn and the country’s bestselling news magazine, Macleans, because it published an excerpt from Steyn’s book containing criticism of Islam.  In Britain in 2003, Scotland Yard launched an investigation of colorful commentator Taki Theodoracopulos – not for using more letters in a name than one ought – but for “inciting racial hatred” by writing that most criminals in northern English cities were black thugs who belonged to gangs.  Across the North Sea in Germany, a leftist politician filed charges against the citizen encyclopedia “Wikipedia” because one of its entries contained too much Nazi symbolism.  Here’s the kicker: It was a piece about the Hitler Youth.  Then there’s Jewish historian Arno Lustiger, who filed a lawsuit in Germany against Vanity Fair magazine because it published an interview with a neo-Nazi.
While the stout-hearted Mark Steyn won’t end up cooling his heels or capitulating, the same cannot be said of everyone.  Wikipedia caved quickly and altered its content, and, although we can expect greater fortitude from more professional operations, the implications are ominous.  As such investigations, charges and lawsuits become more prevalent and start to stick, the media will be increasingly gun shy about publishing politically incorrect views.  Fewer and fewer will deviate from the new Tass line, until news and commentary are banal, barren and bereft of truth.
Surely, though, some of the millions of blogs and other Internet sources would not be cowed, and it would be hard to arrest every one of their operators.  But the government won’t have to.  There’s more than one way to skin a Constitution. 
While the Internet seems like a wild and woolly land of bits and bytes, just as information can be transmitted at the touch of a button, so can it be suppressed.  Remember, when spreading your message, you’re at the mercy of an Internet Service Provider (ISP), hosting company and, to a lesser extent, services that disseminate information, such as search engines.  And as these businesses have already proven, they’re more interested in currency than current events. 
Consider Google’s well-publicized capitulation to communist China.  Using a filter known informally as “The Great Firewall of China,” the search engine’s Chinese version censors information about the independence movement in Tibet, the Tiananmen Square protests and anything else China’s commissars find objectionable. 
It seems like Google’s motto “Don’t be evil” should have a corollary: “But cooperating with it is fine.”                                                            
It should be noted that Google censors information in its German and French searches as well (and probably elsewhere).
Then there’s Google’s subsidiary YouTube.  Early last year it agreed to remove a video Turks found objectionable after a court in Turkey ordered that the site should be blocked in that nation.  It took YouTube all of two days to say mercy.
But direct government action isn’t necessary for censorship, as social pressure often suffices.  In fact, the private sector often enforces “hate speech” codes even where states do not, such as here in the US.  In 2006, pundit Michelle Malkin’s mini-movie “First, They Came”– it showcases victims of Islamic violence — was deleted by YouTube after being “flagged” as inappropriate.  Malkin isn’t alone, either, as other anti-Islamism crusaders have not only had videos pulled, but accounts suspended as well.
Getting back to Google, it has also been censoring traditionalist websites from its news search for quite some time now; entities such as The New Media Journal, Michnews.com and The Jawa Report have been victims, just to name a few.
While these information sources can still be accessed, such censorship takes its toll.  When the most powerful search engine in the world strikes you from its news service, it reduces both your readership and the amount of information at users’ fingertips. 
Censorship threatens individual activism as well.  There are now countless everyday folks who disseminate information via email, sometimes to thousands of recipients.  It’s a quick, efficient and, most importantly, free way to sound the alarm about matters of import. 
Yet email is far from sacrosanct.  Social commentators Dr. David Yeagley and Amil Imani had their MSN Hotmail accounts terminated for criticizing Islam Then there are the proposals to tax or levy fees on email, a truly stifling measure.  It would make bulk transmissions prohibitively expensive for the average citizen, thereby robbing him of a resonant Web voice.
It doesn’t take the prescience of Nostradamus to project into the future.  If political correctness continues to capture minds and hearts, the pressure – both governmental and social – to call truth “hate speech” and censor it will continue to grow.  What happens when search engines not only purge traditionalist dissent from their news services, but also their search results?  What about when sites won’t publish such content for fear of being swept away in the ideological cleansing?  These entities will fold like a laptop. 
It could reach a point where ISPs won’t service you if you send the “wrong” kinds of emails and will block “hateful” sites.  Don’t forget that “access forbidden” prompt.  At the end of the day – and it may be the end of days – hosting companies may just decide that such sites’ business is no longer welcome, and registrars may even freeze their domains (a hosting company provides a site’s “edifice”; a domain is its “address”).  They may be consigned to Internet oblivion.
While these forces march on, we “haters” are busy educating more people every day about the their nature.  This brings us to the race for the American mind.  If we could influence enough citizens to reject political correctness and oust public officials who serve its ends – if we could sufficiently transform the culture – the dropping of this iron muzzle could be forestalled.  By spreading the truth we could ensure that the thought police wouldn’t succeed in suppressing it.
But there’s a reason why I phrased that in the subjunctive.
We are losing.
Education isn’t easy when people aren’t listening.  A great victory for the left is that it has dumbed-down civilization, making people lovers of frivolity and vice, comfortably numb.  It has created legions of disengaged, apathetic hedonists who wouldn’t read a piece of commentary if it was pasted to a stripper.  Such people can be led by the nose and, when they occasionally notice the goings-on in their midst, will welcome the silencing of the “haters.” 
And what of us — you?  If you are a “hater,” your voice will grow fainter, fainter, fainter . . ..
Toward the end, perhaps when tired and old, you’ll have no recourse but to mount a soapbox and preach on some busy corner, as people nervously avert their eyes or measure you up for a straightjacket.  That is, until the men in white coats or black uniforms come and take you to a happy place, or a sad one, the last stop in this world for recalcitrants.
Thanks to Commenter Wordforit for sharing this link for more info:
You may also want to read this: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24176