Is There A Green/Energy Connection with Soro’s Goldman Sachs and Obama?

We have been hearing a lot about $500 Billion for stimulus package, Obama Team wants to work on infrastructure..etc: Oh, right, Paulson did change mind about the Government buying mortgages. Then the Team wants to tackle Global warming.

0ur country is losing jobs right and left. So my question is ‘why in the world would Team Obama want to cost us more jobs in the energy field? Why would ‘the team’ care more about the ‘environment’ than the middle class? Why does ‘the team’ not get it or care that Americans screamed loud and clear that they wanted to be free of Foreign dependence and rely on our resources? Why now when so many are suffering as it is? Why? I have too many questions that need answering and the American people deserve to know the truth..so I challenge us all to find out.

I have posted prior on

Guess What? Obama Plans to Bankrupt Coal Industry!

I have also posted on George Soros before below:

Will Soros Money Determine Election Results? Will Racism Be an Issue?

…Now add Goldman Sachs to the questions? Oh, and don’t forget the Obama connection. We have seen in the past that you can follow the money honey and learn a lot by who benefits. Well, just who does benefit big time from a green policy that would further send us down the pit? Let’s investigate together. Bet we can find some mighty big fish in both parties.

It really does seem that some would like for America to go down…in order to have their NEW WORLD ORDER at our expense.

Hat tip Butasforme

Original article COAL BUST BRIEF (printed below in entirety-thank you for photo)

catch22TEAM OBAMA WARNS OF A ‘PAINFUL’ FUTURE FOR THE MANUFACTURING AND ENERGY SECTORS IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT. OBAMA’S RECENT COMMENTS ON BANKRUPTING THE COAL INDUSTRY, BY OUTRAGEOUS TAXES, SUGGEST THE COAL-RUST BELT TO BE AN EARLY CASUALITY OF OBAMA’S ENERGY PLAN. OBAMA SAYS, IN ELOQUENT RHETORIC, HE IS TRYING TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT. HOWEVER, WHEN THE OPPORTUNITY EMERGES TO ENACT LEGISLATION TO CLEAN UP FOSSIL FUELS, OBAMA VOTES AGAINST THE PLANS. THIS LEAVES THE COAL INDUSTRY IN AN INESCAPABLE PREDICTIMENT SHOULD OBAMA EMERGE AS PRESIDENT: THEY WILL HAVE TO CAPTURE 100% OF CO2 EMISSIONS, BUT OBAMA IS AGAINST LEGISLATION THAT WOULD GET THEM CLOSER TO THE MARK. THIS BEHAVIOR IS NOT ONLY CONTRADICTORY, BUT SUSPECT. A LOOK AT OBAMA’S DONORS TURNS UP INDIVIDUALS WITH OUTSPOKEN AND SHARED INTEREST IN THE ‘GREEN- ENERGY’ INDUSTRY. COULD OBAMA’S ERRATIC ENERGY POLICY BE AN INDICATION HIS ENERGY POLICY IS TIED TO HIS DONORS AND SUPPORTERS?

The first indication something is amiss is the fact Obama’s team is already suggesting the coal industry will be first casualty. This is very odd because we have the largest deposits of coal. This does not mean we have to abandon the pursuit of making this energy clean. We are Americans, and can scientifically accomplish greatness. However, team Obama is quick to lay the groundwork for a huge decline in these jobs. Even worse, team Obama blocks laws that can help this industry become more efficient.

Bloomberg: Obama’s Plan Would Close Half of All New Power Plants.

Jason Grumet, Obama’s Chief Energy Advisor On Obama’s Energy Plan:

“Sen. Obama is somewhat unique in not implying that this radical transformation of our economy is just going to be easy, or that stocks are only going to go up. There are going to be significant changes within the manufacturing sector. Those will be painful for some people…. The campaign believes that in the early years of that transition, there will be some disproportionate impact on different industries and different regions that has to be acknowledged up front; they’re not going to be avoidable…”¹

Jason Grumet, Explaining Obama’s Plan Told C-SPAN:

“Obama is confident his carbon policy will make it “ludicrous” to invest money in new coal that’s not 100% sequestered. You only need a $15/ton price on carbon to make pulverized coal uneconomic. If Obama’s unable to get that climate policy in place, he will do whatever is necessary to prevent construction of a round of new pulverized coal plants, including standards that would essentially amount to a moratorium.”

Obama Called For A Tax On “Dirty Energy” Like Coal and Natural Gas:

“What we ought to tax is dirty energy, like coal and, to a lesser extent, natural gas.” (”Q&A With Sen. Barack Obama,” San Antonio Express-News, 2/19/08).

U.S. News: “Isn’t it True Obama You Want Higher Energy Prices?

So with his obvious aversion to damaging the environment, you think he support laws to make emissions cleaner? Well his record suggests otherwise.

Obama voted against laws that would have helped coal plants capture 100% of the carbon dioxide.

In 2007, Obama Voted Against Mandating The Production Of Six Billion Gallons Of Clean Coal-Derived Fuels. “Bunning, R-Ky., amendment no. 1628 to the Reid, D-Nev., substitute amendment no. 1502. The Bunning amendment would mandate that 6 billion gallons of clean coal-derived fuels’ be produced by 2022. It would define these fuels as having 20 percent fewer greenhouse gas emissions than gasoline and being produced by facilities that capture 100 percent of carbon dioxide emissions.” (H.R. 6, CQ Vote #213: Rejected 39-55: R 39-6; D 0-47; I 0-2, 6/19/07, Obama Voted Nay)

Obama Blocked Statutory Laws to Make Coal Cleaner:

In 2007, Obama Voted Against Authorizing Funds For Coal-To-Liquid Fuels. “Inhofe, R-Okla., amendment no. 1505 to the Reid substitute amendment no. 1502. The Inhofe amendment would expedite the permitting process for the expansion of refinery facilities and authorize funds for the development of coal-to-liquid and cellulosic biomass fuels.” (H.R. 6, CQ Vote #210: Rejected 43-52: R 43-2; D 0-48; I 0-2, 6/13/07, Obama Voted Nay).

His reason?

Obama: “The Bunning amendment would have been premature in requiring the production of billions of gallons of coal-to-liquids without providing strong environmental safeguards to ensure that this new fuel alleviates, not worsens, our climate crisis.” (Sen. Barack Obama, “Obama Statement On Coal-To-Liquid Fuel Proposals,” Press Release, 6/19/07)

It seems funny that Obama has reservations about science. But his obvious resistance puts the coal industry and other industries that utilize fossil fuels in a ‘catch-22‘.

So it is understood that the coal industry has little wiggle room to emerge victorious. But as a nation we will still need energy to power our nation. The Obama team proposes a comprehensive energy plan that is not only expensive, but does not utilize any of America’s natural resources. And you have to admit the fact Obama put the coal industry in a ‘catch-22′ is at best illogical, at worst criminal.

While it is possible Obama truly believes in the newest forms of energy, what if the motive is good old fashioned greed.

If greed is the motive, is not out of the question that Obama is pushing specific energy paths that benefit shared interests at the cost of entire industries such as coal. Obama is on the record saying he wants to move people away from coal by utilizing “price signals” (sharp increases in energy prices that change behavior).

In turn, this manipulative form would be burdensome to the population. Eventually, we would demand cheaper energy. While the architect of the price fluctuations and manipulations would be the Obama administration, he would claim his plan is not for his shared interests’ gain, but helping America deal with energy challenges.

But who does Obama know that has a vested interest in these forms of energy?

World, Meet George Soro’s and Goldman Sachs.

(Research Soros and compare it to Obama. You’ll find striking similarities. It is elections eve, and I do not have a lot of time to get this out. But please post your findings in the comments section. I will update this post with other information).

George Soros is a huge proponent of this type of energy and has investment, though it is not clear to me how in depth they are. (Please research and help out). He also financed Obama’s campaign. He is also a financial manipulator, convicted of illegal insider trading in France for playing financial games with a bank there. A hedge fund operator, George Soros, who was convicted of insider trading in France, is known to make money from the collapse of national economies and currencies. Labeled “The Man who broke the Bank of England” because of his financial activities against the British currency, he is said to be on a witness list of hedge fund operators that will be called to testify before Congress next month―probably after the election.

The statement above, is “known to make money from collapsed economies and currencies..broke the Bank of England, Insider trading, hedge funds,”

Does that not give you pause? In Nazi Germany, he posed as a German and helped round up his own people, took their possessions, in short..enriched himself as his own people were slaughtered. That alone gives me pause…change that to horror.

George Soros raised $60,000 of this Obama funding, with his own donations and those he procured from his family. Soros reportedly met with Obama first in March — a mere state senator, Obama was the only candidate in the country with whom Soros met personally during the 2004 election cycle, according to Soros spokesman Michael Vachon (quoted by CNS News, July 27, 2004). On June 7, 2004, Obama was in Soros’ New York home for an Obama campaign fundraising event.

But this is where it gets interesting.

It’s reported that Obama and Soros staged a disagreement, as if to show the world they were not on friendly terms. But the donations kept on flowing. Odd? Not unless this theory is true.

Other questions concerning campaign financing: Many of Obama’s donations are untracable. He simply will not publish his donors under $200.00. It would not be unreasonable to assume many of his donations are illegal. But could these millions of smaller donations, which he is not required to record, be coming from the same source?

We will not know unless he releases the data. That ain’t likely now to happen. Check this out:

Obama Lied, Now He’ll Slide, On Campaign Finance Audit from Road Sassy

But this network of secret combinations is not limited to Soros and Obama.

Obama’s biggest donor is still Goldman Sachs and the trio (Goldman, Obama and Soros) run deep with their shared interest in this newer form of energy.

Henry Paulson, the man who convinced Bush of the economic crisis, has huge ties with China and Goldman Sachs.

And almost as secretive were Treasury Secretary Paulson’s maneuvers. He produced a quick three-page proposal to make himself a virtual financial dictator without judicial oversight or review. Then just as quickly it was secretly altered so that he would have the authority to bail out banks in China and other foreign countries.

For those interested in some of the fascinating details about Paulson’s extremely close relationship with China, which may have provoked the financial crisis and stands to benefit from it, the October issue of Bloomberg Markets is a good place to start. It notes that Paulson was sworn in as secretary in July 2006 and that by September he was announcing “creation of the first U.S.-China Strategic Economic Dialogue.” Paulson, the magazine reports, has a relationship with Chinese leaders and has traveled to China at least 70 times in his career. It reports that he personally had $25 million worth of holdings in a Goldman Sachs fund whose sole asset was a stake in the Industrial & Commercial Bank of China.

Goldman Sachs, a “full-service global investment banking and securities firm,” is “the leading underwriter of Chinese equity securities and M&A [merger and acquisition] advisor in China,” its website declares.

“Managing the U.S. relationship with China is an increasingly important part of the Treasury secretary’s job,” Bloomberg Markets says. “During the Fannie and Freddie crisis, Paulson used his credibility with Chinese leaders to reassure them that the U.S. mortgage companies weren’t in jeopardy.” Paulson is quoted as saying that “I clearly talked with the Chinese through this. They’ve worked with me enough that they knew I wouldn’t say it unless I believed it.”

Equally significant, on September 23, Paulson’s former firm, Goldman-Sachs, received an infusion of $5 billion from Warren Buffett, a major Obama financial backer and booster.²

There was also a secret meeting with Tom Brokaw, Goldman Sachs and Obama at the museum of modern art.(This meeting happened shorty before Obama’s primetime debate). It has to be left to speculation on what happened at this meeting.)

In addition, it is rumored that Soros funds various media organizations. This Soros backed venture has influence with major television networks, newspapers and magazines. These well backed groups could be the reason the media is so biased towards Obama & Biden.

But the spending and secret combinations even extend beyond the domestic energy programs. Obama is sponsor of a $840 BILLION dollar poverty bill, that subjects the United States to a United Nations tax of 0.7% of GDP. More investigation into this is needed as well.

I urge all of those interested to begin research. Please post your research links in the comments section here. Lets research and get to the bottom of this fishy story.

It is not to say Obama is a huge fraud. But all these events are terribly fishy. It is really really odd. We must get to the bottom of this. Help out.

Forward this to your friends so we get more people working on this, and more people asking questions. The more this gets out the better we can get to the bottom of this.

Sources are in links above.

Drilling For Oil? Whoopee!

 You all know I be liking Glenn Beck…..he had an interesting program on tonight..You just won’t believe it! Say it ain’t so…Not!            

You are not going to believe this;There is drilling for oil finally going on. Guess what? It is  China and India doing the drilling 50 miles from Key West! That’s what I said..Bunny Bread! You read it correctly. Yep, right off our Florida Coast..Whoo Hoo! They call it slant drilling…which means not only could they tap into the natural gas and oil into the Cuban outer Continental Shelf, but it would also allow them arguably to drill into our natural gas.  They can take the oil from underneath us and, yet, we’re not doing a dadgum thing about it.  This is — making me crazy! If you see a woman running up and down the street slightly disheveled and screaming bloody murder..well, you got the right one baby!

What’s amazing about this, too,  is this is the same sort of technology they want to use in an war so they don’t stop.  So, you obviously know they’re going to be disturbing the environment.  In Anwar they can drill hole and drill all under the bottom there. Did you read that right? They will most likely disturb the environment..Yes, they are not concerned with their own nations environment when it comes to the economy and for sure their energy. Do you really think America that they are going to be concerned with ours?  

Havana, Cuba) Cuba has 59 blocks of deep Gulf of Mexico waters claimed in an economic exclusion zone fronting the United States. Of the 59, 28 have been reserved for exploration by seven foreign companies.

The latest to join is the Brazilian state oil company Petrobras which signed the agreement with the Cuban state oil company CUPET on Friday.

The US Geological Survey estimated the North Cuba basin could contain 4.6 billion barrels of oil, with a high-end potential of 9.3 billion barrels, and close to 1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

PDVSA of Venezuela is already a major partner of Cuba in oil, taking out blocks in the gulf and building and modernizing refineries. Others signing agreements include Spain’s Repsol-YPF, India’s ONGC and Nordsk Hydro, Vietnam state oil and gas group Petrovietnam, Malaysia’s state-run Petronas and Canada’s Sherritt International.

 

So, along with Venezuela, Spain, India, Vietnam, Malaysia and Canada, now Brazil will be drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. Isn’t it odd that the only country that can’t drill in the Gulf of Mexico is the one which borders it on three sides?

This is absolutely incredible to me.  Everyone I talked to this weekend, everyone I talked to said, I can’t do it anymore.  I don’t know what — I mean, I don’t even know what to do.  May I ask you a question, America?  How are you doing it?  How are you taking your kids to ballet, to karate, to, you know, Little League, to soccer?  How are you running them to Boy Scouts, Cub Scouts, to the church on Sunday, to school, back and forth?  Most stay at home moms are not at home.  They’re usually in the car shlepping the kids.  How are you affording it anymore?  Gas is going to be the top line expense with everyone.

I mean, food is not magically going up because of, you know, oh, gee, it’s hard to, you know, make a bagel now.  Food is going up because of fuel.  Fertilizer, fuel, delivery, ethanol, all of the things that Congress has done and do you know what I’ve been saying for awhile?  this country is disenfranchised.   The people in Congress are not listening to us. 13 percent approval rating of Congress. They’re not listening.

  Are you with me yet that if we continue down this path, if we continue down this path of — they’re debating cap and trade.  It’s going to cost $1.50 more per gallon.  This is what they’re working on, cap and trade.

Now, it’s not going to pass this time around, but you watch because all three, all three presidential candidates are for cap and trade, which will add $1.50 per gallon for your gasoline.  The EPA estimates it will take 1.1 to $2.8 trillion out of our GDP.  70 percent of our GDP is consumer spending.  That means to take $2.8 trillion out of the GDP it means that you have $2.8 trillion or about, what, 70 percent of that, 1.5, $1.8 trillion less to spend.  It means it stops you from spending because you don’t have any money left and this is what they’re doing.  I’m telling you.  Pitch forks are coming.  The media doesn’t discuss the costs of these things.  So, people ya need to let your reps know what you know and want or don’t want..a need to tell your neigbors, your family, your friends, if you want TRUE CHANGE..not the fancy rhetoric talk of politicians.

  Do you know what?  Before September 11th, when we were all fat and lazy and everybody was talking about technology and Glenn Beck said, I warn you, I warn you, what were the elements that I said?  Do you recall at all?  He told us all you have to do is create fear and hunger. Fear and hunger.  We’ve got fear.  The war is going.  You’ve got fear.  You’re creating hunger now.  When you put hunger into this, because people are not afraid of what they cannot feel or see. Issues are important to us…just saying…I am thinking those two issues at top are going to take over…

But wait a minute.  See, that doesn’t matter.  It doesn’t matter.  People aren’t seeking out that information.  They’re going to seek out the information about gas because it affects them.  Food prices, it affects them.  The media can say whatever you want, but when I say to you China is 50 miles off the coast of Florida building a platform right now along with India, building a platform that includes slant drilling, so it’s 50 miles off our shores, they’re taking the oil from Cuba’s property and they’re also slant drilling into our property or they have the capability of doing that and we are not drilling on our own property, people will say enough of it. OR they should say ENOUGH ALREADY! Everybody can drill offshore except the US..and they are coming here. Our country is rich in resources…we are tied up..we are not PC. We are spoilers. We have no sense to use our own resources and be energy independent and do it with style with the environment intact.. I don’t believe that..I think American ingenuity and innovation is there…it just has to be unleashed.

While  Cap and trade is difficult to understand.  Drilling for your own resources is not.  The shale in Colorado is not.  I mean, they are going up for the oil sands up in Canada.  They’re doing it with the oil sands.  They won’t let us take shale.  Here’s what you need to know.  In 2007 congressional democrats led an effort which became law to prevent the department of interior from enacting new rules for commercial oil shale leases until at least October 2008.  The republicans in May this year tried to get around it saying, okay.  Can we stop this?  Let’s go after the shale.  Well, they didn’t do it.  They didn’t go after the shale.  The democrats are still saying, no, no, no.  The mountains are too important.  Put the mountain back.  Coast off of Florida and California, President Clinton, no, no, no.  Cannot drill anything off our shores until 2012.  Here is what’s at stake:  The outer continental shelf moratorium, the at LAN tack ocean, the outer continental shelf moratorium, Pacific Ocean, outer continental shelf moratorium, Gulf of Mexico.  And even a congressional ban on doing an analysis of the resource potential for oil and gas in the Atlantic, Pacific and the eastern gulf.  We can’t even say can we look into it.  Congress has said no.  Then the Anwar.  Back in 1995 President Clinton vetoed it.  It is 700 miles away from a tree.  700 miles away from a tree. This is the point where my hair starts standing up doing its own dance..believe me, it is not a pretty sight.

Oil, when he vetoed this, was $19 a barrel.  He said we didn’t need the oil that much.  New technology was right around the corner and it would be until 2007 until we got the oil.  So, it was going to take us way too long.  Now oil is — let me see here — $125 a barrel, up from $19 a barrel.  We would have been pumping that oil out now.  They say, well, there’s not that much oil to get, yet.  Here’s a solution in the paper:  Try this solution.  See if this doesn’t make your curly hair straight or vice versa! This is quite possibly my favorite solution.  Ready?  They don’t want to go into Anwar.  No, that’s not go in Anwar.  Let’s not go off of our own chest.  Let’s let China do it but not us.  Let’s not go in and take the shale in the mountains.  Let’s go  take coal.  We’re three times the size of Saudi Arabia in coal to oil, three times.  We’re going up to Canada and buying it from them, but we won’t do it ourself.  Here’s a solution.  Are you ready?  Empty out the strategic petroleum reserves.  Empty out the strategic oil reserves.  It’s now holding 700 million barrels of oil.  That’s nothing to sneeze at.  We’re at war in the Middle East.  Empty out the strategic oil reserve?  Are we intentionally trying to destroy ourselves?

By the way, if you go to buy a new car, if you go to buy a new car, it’s going to cost you about $2,000 extra.  Now, why?  We’re having a hard time selling cars.  Detroit is having problems.  Why would cars go up $2,000 per vehicle?  Because the trains are overloaded, because we can’t afford to ship products by air anymore, because the airlines are becoming obsolete, the airlines cost too much money to ship things.  So, people think, well, I’ll just ship it by train.  Well, now  — the backlog on the trains in Chicago is so enormous, it’s costing $2,000 extra per car to get it onto a train.

By the way, the airlines, they announced last week, the people who sell the jet fuel to the airlines, the airlines are in such precarious positions for the first time ever, they’re being told, by the way, you have to pay cash for everything.  They used to have a 20‑day turn around.  They would give you the jet fuel and the airlines had 20 days to pay it off.  That means the people who are selling the airlines’ fuel think they’re not good for 20 days.  They want cash.

We are in a precarious situation and what is Congress doing today?  Cap and trade?  Something that — to protect the environment? Americans are angry! Congress should start getting concerned. I’m telling you, I don’t know how much carbon torches give off, but the environment is going to weep one of these days because I think Americans are going to light torches and grab pitch forks and head to Washington and tell these clowns, get the h*ll out!  But maybe it’s just me.  What do I know?

 Hat tip source: Glenn Beck

Source:The Jawa Report

Sarcasm Angie

 Great petition on creeping Sharia blog. go pay a visit..lots of current info that will make your blood boil…:)

Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less Petition

 Thanks  to Creeping Sharia for the link for drilling now

Nice idea and long overdue. Click image and learn (in English & Spanish), then sign the non-partisan petition.

Drill Here Drill Now Petition

Gore launches $300 Million Campaign

flirt.gif

Oh jeez, the economy is foundering, and now we got Gore  trying to force us all to buy snake oil!

Obama’s chickens (gyrating and waving arms about) have come home to roost  

Both Democrats and Republicans often say “follow the money.” If you follow the money on MAN-MADE global warming… you will find  the extreme liberals.

If you ask the biggest proponents of MAN-MADE global warming if they have received or plan to receive personal income because of their MAN-MADE claims, 100% would say YES (followed by ‘what’s wrong with that?’).

I wonder if they ever sell ‘carbon credits’ for 1/2 off. Maybe Al Gore gives a discount if you deposit the funds directly into his Swiss bank account? Slap my face, did I say that?

10 years from now everyone will deny they fell for Al Gore’s nonsense. Until then, we have to live with these idiots spewing their insanity. They sound like a new sect of the Branch Davidians with Al Gore as Jesus and SUVs triggering armageddon.

The far lefties are the only people on earth who play the victim card and scream “CHARACTER ASSASSINATION” when we playback what they just said

 In the Al Gore movie, “An Inconvenient Truth”, we see the famous hockey stick chart as proof that global warming is sweeping the Earth. Time and research has taken its toll on that chart. It is no longer regarded as accurate. In fact, it has been quietly dropped by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

 Now the global warming advocates point to the increase in Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere. Its up, way up; no argument about that. Our modern civilization, powered by fossil fuels, sends tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere as we generate electricity to power our lights, furnaces and air conditioners,computers, television sets, cellphone and ipods and as we drive gasoline powered cars and fly in airplanes. Our modern standard of living is absolutely linked to CO2. And it has increased in our atmosphere from around 218 parts per million in 1900 to about 375 ppm today. You need to understand immediately that CO2 is a naturally occurring trace element in our atmosphere. For one thing, we humans produce it every time we breathe. Plants and trees must have it to grow. So CO2 was already in our atmosphere before we discovered oil. CO2 is not a pollutant.

Continue reading

Prophet of Gloom or Alarmist

I was reading an editorial I wanted to share with you from The Paducah Sun 

Alec Baldwin was spot on even if it was unintentional. In his blog Tuesday the actor activist praised the “Nobel Prize winer Abert Gore.” That little typo succinctly captured the former vice president’s essence. He is such a whiner.

Alarmist Al received his Nobel Peace Prize Monday for his work raising awaremess of global warming. His acceptance speech prompted Callow Alec to call Gore “a true global leader.” Of course, in the same post, Baldwin says Gore was “turned out of the presidency by dangerous Bush operatives,..cowardly Supreme Court justices…and thugs posing as election officials on the payroll of Florida’s governor, Jeb Bush.”

Now that’s a vast right-wing conspiracy.

It’s no surprize that someone gullible enough to believe George Bush could pull off a plot of that magnitude would buy what Gore is selling.                                                                                                                Gore also said the “unwelcome verdict” of his loss to George W.Bush “brought a precious if painful gift: An opportunity to search for fresh new ways to serve my purpos…. That quest has brought me here.”

al.jpg

Gore was at his Chicken Little best at Oslo, citing some new reserach proving that we are even nearer the brink than previously thought. He said, “One study estimated that the (North Polar ice cap) could be completely gone in 22 years. Another new study, to be presented later this week ….warns it could happen in as little as seven years. Seven years from now.”

But the MetSul Weather Center in Brazil reported this week that the Arctic ice cap, which did indeed see a record ice melt this summer, has recovered to within 1 percent of normal with winter yet to begin, while the Antarctic ice cap has grown by 772,000 square miles-nearly 20 times the area of Kentucky-in just the last year.

And a new study published this week in the International Journal of Climatology shows that 22 widely used climate models have gotten it wrong for three decades. The models predicted temperatures in the middle and upper troposphere, one to six miles above the earth’s surface, would rise drastically. But actual temperature measurements have revealed almost no temperature change.

Gore thinks the gloval threat is serious enough to compel governments to immediately, drastically curb carbon emissions. He does not, however, think the threat is serious enough to turn down the temperature of the heated indoor pool at his Nashville mansion. Or to skip his excursion aboard a private jet to the tourist resort Bali this week to meet with 10,000 other well-heeled alarmists who will spend 12 days sipping on coconut-mango daiquiris and wringing their hands over climate change.

Participants at the Bali confab will dump between 47,000 tons (U.N. estimate_ and 100,000 tons (private estimate) of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, most of it from the jets transporting the delegates. That’s about the amount of C02 generated by the country of Chad in a year.

In his acceptance speech, Gore did offer a solution.”Most important of all, we must put a price on carbon-with a C02 tax…to shift the burden of taxation from employment to pollution. This is by far the simplest and most effective way to accelerate solutions to this crisis.

The fix for global warming is new taxes? Oh, Great Guru, we expected something a little more, well, profound after coming so far in search of wisdom. You remind us of a former senator from Tennessed; he also thought the solution to every problem was higher taxes.

 

He’s right. Had he been elected president, Gore might actually be doing harm. Instead, he serves a new purpose–providing an endless source of material for late night comics, columnists, cartoonists and editorial writers. His persecuted messiah complex produces comically hyperbolic predictions of gloom. which, combined with the hypocrisy of his ostentatious lifestyle, reveal to everyone-except himself, apparently–what a buffoon he is.

It may be ridiculous to honor this charlatan with a Nobel Peace Prize, but the award ensures that Gore will instead of seeking public office, continue to take himself very seriously doing what he is doing, rendering him harmless.

And for the same reason, we’re glad Alec Baldwin never made good on his threat to leave the country if Bush got elected. He provides almost as much material as the “true global leader.”

People, let’s get a grip..Besides Power & Prestige …follow the money..follow the power prestige mongers. Internationalism, Loss of American Sovereinty, and redistribution of wealth is the name of the game.

Save the Planet-stop having babies!

al.jpgI can see it now…Al Gore ‘Person of the year’ or maybe ‘Mother Earth’.

Now I am all for treating our earth and resources with respect. I believe we should.. but people this is getting crazy!

I found this to be an Interesting transcript from Glenn Beck,

GLENN: Ten years ago she was pregnant. In the last ten years she hasn’t had a chance to cradle her own baby. She hasn’t had a chance to have a pair of innocent eyes gazing up at her with unconditional love, to feel that little hand slipping into hers, a little voice calling saying, “Mommy, Mommy.” The very thought of it Toni now says makes her shudder with horror because when Toni terminated her pregnancy, she did so in the firm belief that she was helping save the planet.This is one of the more incredible stories you will ever hear. She was sterilized at the age of 27 to reduce her carbon footprint. I don’t know, Toni. You’re still breathing. You breathe good oxygen in, you breathe good oxygen out. You know what I’m saying? The bad oxygen, you’re leaving a pretty big carbon footprint. You’re still eating. Maybe you should go to a doctor, see if they can euthanize you. She was so determined that the terrible mistake of pregnancy should never happen again that she begged the doctor who performed the abortion to sterilize her at the same time. He refused. She works for an environmental charity and she “Relentlessly hunted down a doctor who would perform sterilization. Finally eight years ago Toni got her way. At the age of 27, this young woman, at the height of her reproductive years, was sterilized to protect the planet. Instead of mourning the loss of the baby she killed in the womb, Toni relishes her decision.” She says, “Having children is selfish. It’s all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet.” I don’t think I’ve ever — having children is selfish? Toni, Toni, Toni, hmmm. This clearly, from the lips of a person who has never had children. Having children is quite possibly the most selfless thing you could ever do. Believe me, you don’t have time for yourself when you have children. You can’t be selfish. They’re always pooping and sneezing and cryin’. There’s no time for you!


Did you know that we can help American conserve fuel by cutting down trees? Learn more at EvilConservatives.Com.

She says, “Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees, produces more garbage, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, adds to the problem of overpopulation.” Ahhhh! She says, “While most parents view their children as the ultimate miracle of nature,” she says, “They’re a sinister threat to the future.” Yeah, yeah.She said, “When I started school, I got a job at retail and at 19 I met my first husband. No sooner had we finished our wedding cake than all of our relatives started to ask when we could expect a new addition to the family. I always told them it would never happen, but nobody listened. When I was a child I loved bird watching.” Probably bought that damn bird book! “In my teens bird watching developed into a passion for the environment, as well as welfare for animals. I became a vegetarian when I was 15.” A vegetarian? I scoff at vegetarians but let the vegans. “Even my parents used to smile. Well, you’ll change one day. The only person who understood how I felt was my husband, who didn’t want children, either.” Of course not! He’s a guy. He just wants sex without any consequence.“We both passionately wanted to save the planet.” No, he didn’t. He just wanted to have sex with you. “Not to produce any new life that would only add to the problem. ” Boy, that is the best thing. Stu, is that the best scam going?

You know, In my opinion it is up to the individual on whether or not he/she wants to reproduce, but this is getting freaking ridiculous! I can see it now, first we will be limited as to how many children we may have..Sound like China? let’s see now, one, yes one child is the limit..oh, it was an accident..well, we will have to abort and for this trouble you have caused, we need to charge you carbons too! After all, Gore pays just for having lots of rooms to heat and cool. You need to pay because of the long term space you’re taking up!

Here is an excellent link http://arclightzero.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/the-scary-side-of-green/ on scary side of green. Be sure and check it out.

 

Capitalism is destroying the earth, We’re all gonna die..

an-inconvenient-truthpoliticsenvironment.jpg

I have been reading ‘An Inconvenient Book’ by Glenn Beck, thought I would share some juicy tidbits from his chapter on Global warming. Yes, I know some of you are turned off right there. But wait…you do want to know a few facts right? Like some infamous quotes, said goal of environmental movement, Before we espouse something, we really need to know some of the truths behind certain movements as well as some motives, would you not agree?

globew.gif

Last month, it was reported in the paper that the Earth, one third of all animal and plant species is going to be dead. That’s right and we are running out of time. Via Al Gore and the IPCC report. This is just an update of the report they’ve issued over and over that, this it it, final warning: running out of time.

The London Times, says that the only solution is taxes$. Wow! Global taxes$. Just what the world needs, if you ask me, Let’s all pay more, heck, let’s just pay extra when we flush the loo.(love that word) Pay extra when you drive your car. You are polluting, ya know! Go green for the Holidays! That’s another post…sorry cyber buddies.

Here are some quotes, read if you dare.

Canada’s former environmental minister, Christine Stewart. “Climate change provides the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world”.

  Hello, Justice, equality?

If you think health care is expensive now,
wait until you see what it costs when it’s free!
P.J. O’Rourke

Here is another from Christine Stewart.  “No matter if the science is all phony, there is still collateral environmental benefits to global warming policies.

Steven Schneider: “To capture the public imagination, we have to offer up some scary scenarios, make simplified dramatic statements and little mention of any doubts one might have. Each of us has to decide the right balance between being effective and being honest.”

Did you see that? Here is someone promoting ‘the end result justifies the means.’ Do we really want to listen to someone that admits to well, it’s better to be effective than honest. Who is this guy? Stephen Schneider was the lead UN IPCC report author. In 2007 he is still playing a major role. This is also one of the guys who authored one of the original reports that started the global cooling scare of the Seventies, still one of the lead guys.

Dave Foreman, founder of Earth First: ” Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on Earth, social and environmental.”  

Aren’t you loving this attitude? Wow, he must not have any love in his life.

Prince Phillip,World Wildlife Federation really WWE. “If I were reincarnated, I would come back, return to the Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”

 Man, do these people believe in ‘What the world needs now is love’ or what?

George Monbiot, environmental author last year: “Every-time someone dies as a result of floods in Bangladesh airline executives should be dragged out of office and concerned.”

Yeah right, let’s all get warm and fuzzy now.

Helen Cox, Union of Concerned Scientists, “Free Enterprise really means rich people get richer. They have freedom to exploit and psychologically rape their fellow human beings in the process. Capitalism is destroying the Earth. Every-time you turn on an electric outlet, you are making another brainless baby.”

The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings.
The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.
Winston Churchill

Gee, I didn’t know that working hard and trying to improve ones circumstances was exploiting and raping and as far as babies go, well, let’s just say it has been a long time. I do turn on the lights however, I like candles in certain situations of which we shall not go into here. Me, I’m just an average middle class over the hill, with a fat arse trying to help make my family’s life better.

Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund:”The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We cannot let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization we have in the U.S. we must stop third world countries right where they are.”

 Wow, so much for democracy and forget about the pursuit of happiness. Now I know, my car won’t bring me happiness, but I submit to you, driving a car to the nearest town is a whole lot better than a bicycle when you are as I have already shared with you. Remember, over the hill, fat arse, yada yada. The point is, do these people really care about people having a better life or a free life? What is the motive behind the lies, we know they don’t care, betcha they got ca$h cars and jets too and I bet they flush more than once a day and turn on the lights too!

Listen, I have no problem with recycling, turning off lights to save on utilities, nor do I have a problem with saving gas mileage, less pollution in whatever way albeit a hybrid or whatever.

 I do have a problem with shady hypocritical motives and manipulation as I know you do. I do have a problem with too much Big Brother. I do have a problem with our Country being trashed. I do have a problem with having an opinion if I have not studied and researched to the best of my ability what is really going on with the issues I care about. Sometimes it is just too easy to go with the flow. To believe the hype. Just because I read it or heard it through the Media, does not mean it is always true. Usually a lie or exageration comes dressed with a little bit of  truth, just enough to get by unless exposed. That’s how they get us. They deceive us to get what they want. Let’s see, the Bible says. ‘The love of money is the root of all evil” note,  it does not say money is evil. Just what kind of evil you will do to get it. 

100_bill_rotate_md_clr.gif

Giving money and power to government
is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.
P.J. O’Rourke

Did you know, that according to a recent study by Michigan State University, “we should save our marriages to save the environment.” Hey now really, Must they go so far as to intrude there too?  Arclightzero has an a great post on that on his site, go check it out on Pro Patria or on side bar if link does not work. He has a link on the scary side of green that is excellent, http://arclightzero.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/the-scary-side-of-green/

This is the goal of the environmental movement, to stop America, to stop development, to stop the Third World, to redistribute the wealth, to take your money and give it to an organization that can better decide how it should be distributed. It is the global movement for Justice and Equality. Now, that’s not what our neighbor thinks. In fact, we are being sold on it continuously through T.V. and yes companies that want to profit from our Go Green mentality. But the above is true and at some point Americans have got to unite and stand with the truth. There is no dismissing our future.

“If you don’t read the newspaper you are uninformed,
if you do Read the newspaper you are Misinformed.”
Mark Twain

They know the time to strike is now, the time to get these treaties through are now. I don’t care if it’s a Republican or Democrat. Republicans are starting down this road because so many Americans have been co-opted into this lie that they are going to have no spine and they are going to go along with it. This is a plot from the far far left, and we all have no idea what is going on. Remember John Edwards when he said” This is going to cause great pain, higher energy prices, higher gas prices, higher food prices, we’re going to pay higher taxes but we’ve got to do it and there may be more on the horizon that we don’t even know but we’ve got to do it.’

I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity
is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.
Winston Churchill

Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases:
If it moves, tax it.
If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan (1986)

Hey, the world is getting warmer. The Earth has always gotten warmer and then it has gotten warmer and then it has gotten colder. For instance, “Time” magazine wrote in 1924 (no I was not around then) about global warming..I’m sorry, global cooling. And then in ’39 it was global warming. And then in ’74 it was global cooling and then it’s warming again.  The ‘New York Times” did the same thing, 1924, stories all about global cooling. ’35, global warming, ’75. global cooling. Today it’s warming again. It happens over and over and over again, but they have so captured the imagination and the fear of people that we’re all going to be wiped off the face of the planet and it is a lie! It is a lie! Read the phrases from the environmentalists that should open our minds and open our eyes and arm us with ability to save the open-minded people that are left, the ones that have been duped, the ones who don’t know. They are all good intentioned but have been hoodwinked.

Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer of money
from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries.
Douglas Casey, Classmate of Bill Clinton at Georgetown University

Yes America has problems, Does it need to improve? Yes, but this is my country and I believe it is the greatest country on earth. Am I prejudiced? Sure, just like I’m prejudiced about my kid and my grandsons, they are the best looking cutest smartest kids to grace this world. Seriously, this post would take up far too much room to discuss today all the good, yes good that the American people have done and are doing to better the world. I may do that sometime. I think we would all be surprised. Why, because we are trashed so much by our own Media that has the right to do that because of American sacrifices.

Our forefathers would be turning over in their grave if they could know how we have yes, even changed history to be politically correct. Heck, in some cases, it is not even taught! We are so careful not to offend that it has ‘honest to God’ become a landmine. Have we lost our ability to be entrusted with so great a gift as our Ancestors fought for?

A government big enough to give you everything you want,
is strong enough to take everything you have.
Thomas Jefferson

 We have no concept of what is right around the corner, and what is right around the corner is the loss of sovereignty.  Gang, the Sea Treaty that has been proposed once again is about giving up our sovereignty on the sea. It is about our Navy answering to the Great Whoever! Combine loss of that with The Big Environment push, not to mention unsecured borders that any terroist can cross.  It is about the destruction of the United States of America.

 

Actually I am an Independent Conservative Liberal! I am fiscally conservative (concerned about a Big Brother Big government mentality) with compassion that can make up my own mind based on the issues that are important to me. That is not a politically correct stance. Until somebody steps up and takes the bull by the horn, I just feel they all have a way to go to get my vote. 

Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep
voting on what to have for dinner .
James Bovard