Schwarzenegger says McCain ‘Real Action Hero’

Wolf Blitzer had an interview with Obama about it after you see the video


“John McCain served longer in a POW camp than his opponent has in the United States Senate. … Ladies and gentlemen, I only play an action hero in my movies, but John McCain is a real action hero.”

Continue reading

Your Choice of Health Care- McCain’s or Obama’s?

I have heard so much about the ‘health care’ plans of McCain and Obama. Frankly, there is a lot of misconception out there about both. So let’s look at them. This is a fairly simple way to ‘get it’ and then you can decide which is best for you. Thanks to Ms Placed Democrat! If health care is important to you and you want to understand the real difference in pretty simple language..take a look.

Continue reading

McCain Socked It to Em at New York Dinner

Where has this John McCain been? He socked it to them with humor but it was a winner!

McCain brings down the House in New York attending the Al Smith Dinner!

Continue reading

Keeping it Real-McCain Palin

Hattip to MK’s Views – Down under on the right side

Taking a few days off friends, 3 new posts today. Lots more in the back soon. Meanwhile enjoy this video. Too cool! Don’t miss tomorrows scheduled post on Obama past as a Socialist.

‘This Is Not The Man I Knew’ & I Had No Idea Of Friend’s Past..Obama, Your Pants Are Still On Fire!



This is from John McCain’s speech today in Albuquerque, New Mexico, Several have said it is one of the best speeches they’ve heard him give recently.  It’s Time McCain spoke out, many have called on him to do so from the beginning. You can’t count on the Media to bring it out. They did not even listen to Hillary during the primaries.. The Media did not investigate her claims of voter fraud. Why in the world would the GOP think they would do anything now? It is up to us to get it it, blog it, tell it. Then if they do not listen and want to believe the Liberal Left..well, that’s what they will get and we will all suffer. We will know that we have done our best and that is all one can do.

 C-Span has the full speech

Hattip NoQuarterusa

FULL LINK Open Thread * It Matters How You Respond (or Don’t), Mr. Obama [Update]

Today, on CNN, Obama’s chief strategist David Axelrod asserted that Obama didn’t even know about Ayers’ radical past as a founder of the Weathermen.

Didn’t even know? What are you on people? We have been talking about this for a year. Tell me, Were you on something then or now?  All together now let’s sing.. Memories… by Barbara Streisand and see if you can recall..

But bringing it up seems to be a tactical error. 


It seems defensive. It opens up a factual issue that will merit more journalism, and more attention — can anyone contradict Axelrod? When did Obama find out who Ayers was? Already, paper is flying out of the McCain camp:

Does Barack Obama truly expect the American people to believe that he had no idea about his friend’s past as the infamous founder of the domestic terror group ‘The Weather Underground’ or is he just lying? If Obama didn’t know in 1995 about the bombings Ayers was responsible for, when did he find out — because Obama was promoting Ayers’ book in 1997, serving on boards with him until 2002, and trading emails and phone calls with him as recently as 2005. If Obama really was unaware of Ayers’ radical past, learning the truth doesn’t seem to have had any effect on their friendship.” …

The Newsday blogger adds All the McCain camp wants is for people to talk about Obama-Ayers, and Axelrod has provided fuel for the discussion.

Continue reading

I’ve Got A Bracelet Too! Uh, Uh, Wait a minute, gotta read the name!

Too bad you could not remember the name! Must have been important to you, eh?

Did you happen to catch the great one acting like a child when he said, “I’ve got a bracelet too”in the debate with John McCain. McCain was sharing a touching story of a bracelet he wore to honor a soldier?

It reminded me of a child…ME TOO, ME TOO! the more I see this man that wants to lead us, the more I believe he is narcissistic . Did you notice how he could not remember the name on the bracelet he was wearing and had to look down and read it? I believe he was trying to convince us he cares. He would not want us to believe that those like code pink etc: support him. He wants us to think he is capable of being the Commander in Chief.

He dishonored those that the bracelets stand for and those who love them. Perhaps Nobama would do well to wear one of those t-shirts that say ‘ITS ALL ABOUT ME’!

Continue reading

Update on Clinton Praise of McCain-Palin

Diplomacy or Wisdom

Do we really believe the Clintons think NObama is experienced enough to lead this country? Do they really believe the hype put out by the DNC? Or do you think as I that they are secretly hoping McCain wins? Hard to tell for sure..You be the judge.

Go to former post with update on latest happenings.

Clinton Praises Sarah Palin, Calls McCain a Great Man

Is Sex Ad by the McCain Campaign right? You be the Judge

Is Sex Ad by The McCain campaign right? You be the judge.

First, read the bill, especially line 14, and judge for yourself.

Now, read this excellent article in National Review Online by Byron York, who interviewed one of the bill’s sponsors.

After reading the bill and York’s article, it’s hard to disagree with York’s conclusion:

“[T]he bill’s intention was to mandate sex education, especially concerning contraception and the prevention of sexually-transmitted diseases, for children before the sixth grade and as early as kindergarten. Obama’s defenders may howl, but the bill is what it is.”

The condemnation has been so widespread that the Obama campaign has begun to sense success in placing the “McCain-is-a-liar” storyline in the press. But before accepting the story at face value, it might first be a good idea to examine the bill in question, look at the statements made by its supporters at the time it was introduced, talk to its sponsors today (at least the ones who will consent to speak), and find answers to a few basic questions. What were the bill’s provisions? Why was it written? Was it really just, or even mostly, about inappropriate advances? And the bottom-line question: Is McCain’s characterization of it unfair?

Source: Michelle Malkin and Byron York of National Review.links above