This is the second of the series on Population Control. Be sure to read the statements of our ‘elite’ on the subject in the former post.

 Thanks to Aurora of the MidnightSun

BabiesChoose your butcher’s knife. Tax families through the nose or implement mass culling, the call for extreme population reduction is on the rise. Worldwide population control is rapidly moving into mainstream from the realm of extremist nutters. Last night we posted on the recommendation by Barry Walters, academic at the University of Western Australia that a tax be imposed on families who dare have more than two children. This would effectively mean that, as in Communist China, families would have to pay for the privilege of having children. But he is just one in a large number and he’s not the worst, not by a long shot!

Walters implied that the controversial population-control policies in place in China and India should be emulated.

“As citizens of this world, I believe we deserve no more population concessions than those in India and China.” (SOURCE)

Last year, a well-known scientist in Texas recommended something far more dramatic:

A top scientist gave a speech to the Texas Academy of Science last month in which he advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the population through the airborne ebola virus. Dr. Eric R. Pianka’s chilling comments, and their enthusiastic reception again underscore the elite’s agenda to enact horrifying measures of population control.

Pianka’s speech was ordered to be kept off the record before it began as cameras were turned away and hundreds of students, scientists and professors sat in attendance.

Saying the public was not ready to hear the information presented, Pianka began by exclaiming, “We’re no better than bacteria!”, as he jumped into a doomsday malthusian rant about overpopulation destroying the earth.

Standing in front of a slide of human skulls, Pianka gleefully advocated airborne ebola as his preferred method of exterminating the necessary 90% of humans, choosing it over AIDS because of its faster kill period. Ebola victims suffer the most tortuous deaths imaginable as the virus kills by liquefying the internal organs. The body literally dissolves as the victim writhes in pain bleeding from every orifice.

Pianka then cited the Peak Oil fraud as another reason to initiate global genocide. “And the fossil fuels are running out,” he said, “so I think we may have to cut back to two billion, which would be about one-third as many people.”

Later, the scientist welcomed the potential devastation of bird flu and spoke glowingly of China’s enforced one child policy, before zestfully commenting, “We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth.”

At the end of Pianka’s speech the audience erupted not to a chorus of boos and hisses but to a raucous reception of applause and cheers as audience members clammered to get close to the scientist to ask him follow up questions. Pianka was later presented with a distinguished scientist award by the Academy. Pianka is no crackpot. He has given lectures to prestigious universities worldwide.

One horrified observer was able to make notes on the speech and our gratitude goes to Forrest M. Mims for bringing this sickening display to the attention of the world. (SOURCE)

May I take this opportunity to remind you of the oft-predicted impending plague that our hospitals are preparing for. Check our story here.

Don’t be unaware. We are living in one of the worst periods of history and we have yet to see what the lunatic fringe elite are capable of. Protect yourself and your family if you can and hold on tight.

Here is another great group:

Perfect familyIf this group is listened to, you will be permitted to have no more than two children as we must at all costs protect the environment. The population which is now 60 million must be reduced to 20 million. 40 million excess people will have to be eliminated somehow.

The group making these outrageous statements is made up of professors, editors and other ‘distinguished’ figures: the type that awe governments and influential groups into submission. Let’s hope they go away. Check this out, and this and this.



  1. One way or another Angie, we humans are the problem to these elites, we are not part of the solution. The only thing is, they always happen to be the chosen few who are not deserving of the culling, funny that!

    Yes, we are the problem to elites. The chosen few who rule would not put themselves in the position of being on the end of extermination. No, They just want to make the decisions of who is to live and die and have a more comfortable world without all the little people who are nobodies in their opinion.

  2. Angie, thanks for the link. It horrifies me again as I read it now. This is the kind of depraved thinking that drives our political elite. If you ever wondered what was behind some of the initiatives of the Left, wonder no more.

    Aurora, you are welcome. You have so much good information that I could spend all day over there just absorbing and reading your links. Thank you for your hard work. It is much appreciated.

  3. I think you misunderstand much of what you’ve read. While there are overpopulation activists who promote mandatory birth limits, and even a few who would celebrate nature’s harsh methods of responding to our overpopulation of the planet, many simply believe in educating mankind about overshoot and the impact of our decisions about family size.

    It’s dishonest to characterize most of these warnings as promoting population control measures. For example, you link to a story about Profesor Guillemaud’s warnings about UK population growth rate as an example of an elitist calling for population control. Yet the professor was actually quoted as saying: “No one is in favour of governments dictating family size but we need to act quickly to prevent it.” Does your case require such dishonesty in order to be made?

    I think the point many of us would like to make is this: we can either begin to voluntarily exercise some self-control and limit our own family size and eliminate government subsidies of fertility, or we can let nature do this for us, and risk needing to exercise restrictive measures in the future.

    Dave Gardner
    Hooked on Growth: Our Misguided Quest for Prosperity

    Thank you for your points. I wanted to acknowledge your comment as quickly as possible. I will go back and once again read the link to which you refer,Profesor Guillemaud’s. However,Imo the rest pretty well stand on their own. There are many ways as you and others have pointed out that would certainly be more humane and we would not lose the right of choice.

    I have since checked the link which pertained to the UK limiting families to 2 children. So that was certainly not dishonest in providing the link about governments calling for limiting the number of children. Yes, Professor Guillemaud made a very wise statement in the last paragraph. We certainly do need some wisdom before we start acting like China imo. I am sorry, I believe we have certain inalienable rights while at the same time, education on this subject. I checked your blog and noted you have a film coming up educating us on (as I understand) how prosperity is not always good and sometimes recession is needed for the earth? I tried to click on former Pres. Clintons message about the economy and for some reason could not get it. I will go back later when I have more time and check it out.

    Thanks for your input.

  4. That is some creepy stuff. Wow.

    Yes it is. How ya doing?


Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s